MALVICINO, ET AL.
v.
SCHVARTZMAN, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in its decision.
This case involves an appeal from a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County. The specific factual details underlying the dispute are not elaborate…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Discretion (Standard Of Review) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 1, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-1801 Lower Tribunal No. 14-32662 ________________ Carlos Malvicino, et al., Appellants, vs. Valeria Schvartzman, et al., Appellees. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge. Lawrence J. Shapiro & Associates, P.A., and Lawrence J. Shapiro, for appellants. Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Abbey L. Kaplan and Jamie L. Zuckerman, for appellees. Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion given the record, we affirm. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070(J); Premier Capital LLC v. Davalle, 994 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Affirmed. 2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gomez v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Tr. Co., 994 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)