WILLIAM J. VICKERS
v.
ANNIE D. THOMAS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court discharged jurisdiction and dismissed the review proceeding.
Petitioner Vickers sought review of a Fifth District Court of Appeal decision in a dispute with respondent Thomas.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Express And Direct Conflict cases and more on FLexlaw
Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC18-270 ____________
WILLIAM J. VICKERS, Petitioner,
vs.
ANNIE D. THOMAS, Respondent.
November 29, 2018
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Vickers v. Thomas, 237 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration and hearing oral argument, we exercise our discretion to discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct Conflict of Decisions
Fifth District - Case No. 5D15-3610
(Seminole County)
Angela C. Flowers of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Ocala, Florida,
for Petitioner
Jeffrey M. Byrd and Heather A. Trombly of Jeffrey M. Byrd, P.A., Orlando, Florida,
for Respondent