MICHAEL BOYINGTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel must be dismissed when it is untimely and successive under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5) and (d)(6)(C).
[1] A petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be dismissed as untimely and successive under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d)(5) and (d)…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Boyington, proceeding pro se, filed a petition in the First District Court of Appeal alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-2372 _____________________________
MICHAEL BOYINGTON,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________ Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
November 6, 2018
PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is dismissed as an untimely, successive petition. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5) and (d)(6)(C). ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Michael Boyington, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.