CHRISTOPHER HAGGAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-11-05
No. 18-3267
Torpy, J., Berger, J., Harris, J.
263 So. 3d 132 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

When a defendant who initially posted bond fails to appear, then voluntarily surrenders and moves to set bond while claiming the failure was unintentional, the trial court must hold a hearing to determine whether the failure was willful and whether reasonable conditions of release exist.


Headnotes

[1] When a defendant who posted bond fails to appear and then voluntarily surrenders while claiming the failure was unintentional, the trial court must conduct a hearing to d…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“After a defendant fails to appear, if he seeks bond and claims that his failure was unintentional, the court must hold a hearing. The court must then determine whether the failure was willful, and whether any reasonable conditions of pretrial release exist.”

Statement of applicable law regarding bond hearings after failure to appear

Facts & Procedural History

Haggan was initially granted and posted bond after arrest. He failed to appear at a trial management conference, a capias was issued, and he turned hi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Harris

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHRISTOPHER HAGGAN, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D18-3267 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 5, 2018 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Robert Wesley, Public Defender, and Robert Adams, Assistant Public Defender, Orlando, for Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Haggan petitions for an emergency writ of habeas corpus, challenging his pretrial detention without bond. We grant the petition and remand for further proceedings. Haggan was initially granted and posted bond after his arrest. However, he failed to appear at a trial management conference and the court issued a capias. Almost one

In his petition, Haggan argues that the trial court was required to hold a hearing to determine whether his failure to appear was willful, as well as whether any reasonable conditions of release would ensure his future appearances. The State agrees that the trial court should have granted a hearing on Haggan’s motion.

After a defendant fails to appear, if he seeks bond and claims that his failure was unintentional, the court must hold a hearing. The court must then determine whether the failure was willful, and whether any reasonable conditions of pretrial release exist. See, e.g., Prokopishen v. State, 82 So. 3d 1046, 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (citing State v. Blair, 39 So. 3d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 2010)). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(c) addresses Haggan’s precise situation, providing that a defendant who at first fails to appear and then “voluntarily appears or surrenders” will not be eligible for a recognizance bond if the failure to appear was “willfully and knowingly” done. In this case, the factual question of Haggan’s intent remains unresolved, and the trial court will need to hear that issue to decide it. See Blair, 39 So. 3d at 1194-95; Harvey v. State, 238 So. 3d 353, 354- 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (concerning defendant who was released on bond and failed to appear the day after Hurricane Irma); Prokopishen, 82 So. 3d at 1047. Therefore, we grant the petition and remand for the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine whether Haggan’s failure to appear was willful.

PETITION GRANTED.

Footnotes
2 month later, Haggan turned himself in and moved to set bond in a facially sufficient motion, alleging, among other things, that his failure to appear was unintentional. The next day, the trial court denied Haggan’s motion without a hearing and without making any findings.
3 TORPY, BERGER, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw