TYRONE JONES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A judgment revoking community control must identify the specific condition violated.
[1] A judgment revoking community control must identify the specific condition of community control that was violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTyrone Jones admitted to violating community control by failing to remain confined to his residence. The trial court revoked his community control and…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Community Control cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
TYRONE JONES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-2201
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed November 16, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Shawna R. Moyers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Jones appeals the judgment and sentence imposed after he admitted to violating community control by failing to remain confined to his residence. We have reviewed the record and find no error. However, the order revoking Jones’s community control failed to identify which condition of community control Jones violated. Accordingly,
2 we remand for the trial court to enter a judgment specifying which condition Jones violated. E.g., Roberts v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of an amended judgment. COHEN, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Spivey v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
Authorities Cited
- Roberts v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
- Taylor v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)