DARRIAS SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court cannot impose a life sentence for aggravated battery with a firearm when the statutory maximum for that second-degree felony is 15 years, even when a 25-year minimum mandatory term is imposed under the 10-20-Life statute.
[1] A minimum mandatory sentencing range established by statute does not create a new statutory maximum penalty that exceeds the statutory maximum for the underlying offense.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Once the trial court imposed a minimum mandatory term of 25 years, it could not exceed the 30-year maximum penalty for a first-degree felony under section 775.082. The 25-year to life minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)3. [the 10-20-Life statute] does not create a new statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment.”
Court's reasoning citing Brown v. State regarding the limits of minimum mandatory sentencing ranges.
Smith was convicted in 2008 of aggravated battery with a firearm with a special finding of great bodily harm. He was sentenced to life imprisonment wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Minimum Mandatory Term cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DARRIAS SMITH,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-2399
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 28, 2018
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Morgan Laur Reinman, Judge.
Darrias Smith, Raiford, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela
J.
Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Darrias Smith appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, wherein he argues that the life portion of his sentence for aggravated battery with a firearm is illegal because it exceeds the statutory maximum for that offense. We agree and reverse.
2
In 2008, Smith was found guilty by a jury of aggravated battery, with a special finding that he caused death or great bodily harm by discharging a firearm. The trial court adjudicated him guilty of "aggravated battery with firearm while inflicting great bodily harm" pursuant to section 784.045(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2007).1 He was sentenced to serve life in prison with a 25-year minimum mandatory term pursuant to the 10-20-Life statute. See § 775.087(2)(a)1.f., (2)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2007). We conclude the life portion of his sentence was imposed in error.
Based on the jury’s verdict, the minimum mandatory sentencing range permitted under section 775.087(2)(a)3., was 25 years to life imprisonment. Here, the trial court did not impose life as a minimum mandatory sentence, but rather 25 years. Thus, the nonmandatory life portion of his sentence is illegal because it exceeds the statutory maximum of 15 years for a second-degree felony. See §§ 775.082(3)(c), 784.045(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); Brown v. State, 983 So. 2d 706, 707 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ("Once the trial court imposed a minimum mandatory term of 25 years, it could not exceed the 30-year maximum penalty for a first-degree felony under section 775.082. The 25-year to life minimum mandatory range under section 775.087(2)(a)3. [the 10-20-Life statute] does not create a new statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment." (citing Yasin v. State, 896 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005))).
Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court, vacate the life portion of Smith’s sentence, and remand for correction consistent with this opinion. See Brown, 983 So. 2d
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BERGER, LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cortez Hatten v. State, 203 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 2016)
- Mulazim M. Yasin v. State, 896 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Walker v. Walker, 983 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
- Montrell L. Johnson v. State, 149 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
- Roberts v. State, 158 So. 3d 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)