MARLON D. FLEMING
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se petitioner whose filings regarding specific criminal cases have been found abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous will be sanctioned for any further similar filings, including a bar on pro se filing and referral for prison disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant for filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pleadings by imposing a bar on future pro se filings and referring the matt…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMarlon D. Fleming, a pro se litigant incarcerated in Raiford, filed a petition for writ of mandamus regarding four Orange County Circuit Court crimina…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARLON D. FLEMING,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D18-3384
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 31, 2018
Petition for Writ of Mandamus, John Marshall Kest, Respondent Judge.
Marlon D. Fleming, Raiford, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration that Petitioner’s filings regarding Orange County Circuit Court Case Numbers 2000-CF-006410-A-O, 2000-CF-007495-A-O, 2000-CF-010324-A-O, and 2000-CF- 010414-AO have been found to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se pleadings filed in this Court asserting claims stemming from any of the four identified case numbers will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat (2018). TORPY, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.