R.S.B. VENTURES, ET AL.
v.
BERLOWITZ, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a party withdraws counsel from a case, the withdrawal is timely if it leaves adequate time for replacement counsel to meet applicable trial and appellate deadlines.
[1] Counsel withdrawal from a case is timely when it leaves adequate time for replacement counsel to meet applicable trial and appellate deadlines.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellees withdrew from the underlying case in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The trial court found that the withdrawal left adequate time f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney Withdrawal cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-2607 Lower Tribunal No. 17-434 ________________
R.S.B. Ventures, Inc., etc., et al., Appellants,
vs.
Jeffrey Scott Berlowitz, etc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa I. Rodriguez, Judge.
Litigation Lawyers Professional Association, and Stephen Rakusin (Fort Lauderdale), for appellants.
Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Thomas E. Scott and Melinda S. Thornton, for appellees.
Before LOGUE and MILLER, JJ., and SUAREZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
2
On the specific record before us, we agree with the trial court that Appellees withdrew from the underlying case leaving adequate time for replacement counsel to meet the applicable trial and appellate deadlines. Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So. 2d 523, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Maillard v. Dowdell, 528 So. 2d 512, 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Frazier v. Effman, 501 So. 2d 114, 115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Maillard v. Dowdell, 528 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Frazier v. Effman, 501 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 616 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Yates v. State, 616 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)