DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
v.
RANDY DOYLE ROSS, JR. AND STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2019-02-01
No. 18-2471
Merritt, J., Orfinger, J., Berger, J., Grosshans, J.
263 So. 3d 260 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A commitment order must be supported by evidence that the respondent meets the statutory requirements for commitment under section 916.13, Florida Statutes.


Headnotes

[1] A commitment order must be supported by evidence establishing that the respondent meets the statutory requirements for commitment; commitment without such evidentiary sup…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“[B]ecause there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support the findings it made, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by ordering commitment.”

Court's citation to Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. Lotton, 172 So. 3d 983, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)

Facts & Procedural History

The circuit court committed Randy Doyle Ross, Jr. to the care of the Department of Children and Families. A psychiatric examination by Dr. Bursten con…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Grosshans

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-2471

RANDY DOYLE ROSS, JR. AND

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondents.

____________________________________/

Opinion filed February1, 2019

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order, from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Daniel B. Merritt, Jr., Judge.

Joyce

L.

Miller, Assistant Regional Counsel, of Department of Children and Families, Tavares, for Petitioner.

Ashley

B.

Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida. No Appearance for Respondent, Randy Doyle Ross, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Children and Families (DCF) petitions this Court for certiorari review, challenging the circuit court’s order committing Randy Doyle Ross, Jr., to their care. DCF argues the order departs from the essential requirements of law because Ross

2 does not meet the statutory requirements for commitment. See § 916.13, Fla. Stat. (2018). The State properly concedes error.1 Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash the order under review, and remand for further proceedings. See Dep't of Child. & Fams. v. Lotton, 172 So. 3d 983, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ("[B]ecause there was no evidence presented to the trial court to support the findings it made, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law by ordering commitment.").

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED. ORFINGER, BERGER and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 After examining Ross, Dr. Bursten concluded that he was not incompetent due to mental illness, but rather was pretending to be incompetent, otherwise known as "malingering."

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw