SHAMEKA DANIEL MORRIS

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2019-03-06

No. 18-3272

265 So. 3d 608 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2019) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam

Per Curiam

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHAMEKA DANIEL MORRIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3272 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 6, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Brooks, 890 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); State v. Gutierrez, 10 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).. SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Taylor v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
Oquendo v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2023)
Coffer v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (Polk County) (M.D. Fla. 2025)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)
State v. Brooks, 890 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
State v. Gutierrez, 10 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

SHAMEKA DANIEL MORRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA