WILLIAM E. RUSSELL, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant who enters a no contest plea without expressly reserving the right to appeal a prior order denying a motion to suppress statements cannot appeal that suppression issue on direct appeal.
[1] A defendant who enters a no contest plea must expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior order denying a motion to suppress in order to preserve that issue for appella…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRussell pled no contest to burglary of a dwelling with the assistance of counsel. He did not expressly reserve the right to appeal the denial of a mot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Payment Of Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM E. RUSSELL, JR.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1470
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 29, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Gail A. Adams, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, David M. Dixon, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, William E. Russell, Jr., appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he pled, with the assistance of counsel, no contest to burglary of a dwelling. Although we affirm, one issue merits discussion. Russell did not expressly reserve the
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, C.J., EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
2 See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)