SOLOMON ARTHUR COHEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied appellant's rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.
[1] Abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings in postconviction proceedings may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filing and referral to prison officia…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSolomon Arthur Cohen appealed the denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in a criminal case from Brevard County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
SOLOMON ARTHUR COHEN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3840
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 29, 2019
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Nancy Maloney, Judge.
Solomon Arthur Cohen, Carrabelle, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in Brevard County Circuit Court Case No. 05-1998-CF-030294-A. We affirm the trial court's order and caution him that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
WALLIS, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.