CRAIG LAZAR BENT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA AND LOUIS A. QUINONES, JR., AS CHIEF OF ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court abuses its discretion by refusing to hold a hearing on a motion to set bond when the motion is supported by a witness's recantation of identification testimony and corroboration by law enforcement.
[1] A trial court abuses its discretion by refusing to hold a hearing on a motion to set bond when the motion is supported by credible evidence of witness recantation and cor…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner was charged with second-degree felony murder and attempted first-degree murder based largely on photo lineup identifications by two witness…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonable Bail cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CRAIG LAZAR BENT,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D19-1060
STATE OF FLORIDA AND LOUIS A.
QUINONES, JR., AS CHIEF OF
ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Respondents.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 1, 2019
Petition for Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Lauren Elizabeth Bobek, Orlando, for Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent, State of Florida. No Appearance for other Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Craig Lazar Bent, petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is illegally detained and entitled to a new hearing to determine reasonable bail. Because we agree that Petitioner is entitled to a hearing, we grant the petition.
Considering the record before us and Richardson’s seeming recantation of the certainty of her identification, which is now allegedly supported by the statement of a law
PETITION GRANTED; CAUSE REMANDED. EISNAUGLE, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.