KENNETH BROWN
v.
LAUREN BROWN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant who fails to provide trial transcripts cannot challenge the trial court's factual findings unless fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.
[1] An appellant's failure to provide trial transcripts precludes appellate review of the trial court's factual findings and evidentiary support for its decisions, and the ap…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We must affirm unless the former husband can demonstrate that 'fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.'”
The court's standard for review when trial transcripts are not provided
Kenneth Brown appealed a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Lauren Brown. The judgment addressed timesharing, equitable distribution of marital…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Equitable Distribution Of Marital Assets cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
KENNETH BROWN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1263
LAUREN BROWN,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 28, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Wayne C. Wooten, Judge.
Jaime T. Halscott, of Halscott Megaro, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
Mercedes R. Wechsler, Mercedes R. Wechsler, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The former husband, Kenneth Brown, appeals the final judgment dissolving his marriage to the former wife, Lauren Brown. He challenges the timesharing, equitable distribution of marital assets and debt, retroactive support, and attorney’s fee award on appeal. Because the former husband has not provided this Court with the necessary transcripts of the proceedings below, we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court’s decisions on these matters are without evidentiary support. See Applegate v.
2 Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); see also Rayess v. Bitar, 254 So. 3d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). We must affirm unless the former husband can demonstrate that “fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former husband has made no such showing in this case.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Somma v. Metra Elecs. Corp., 727 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
- Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
- Mayada Rayess v. Bitar, 254 So. 3d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)