ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition for writ of certiorari challenging a trial court's subject matter jurisdiction is treated as a petition for writ of prohibition and is subject to denial on that basis.
[1] A petition for writ of certiorari challenging a trial court's subject matter jurisdiction is treated as a petition for writ of prohibition and may be denied on that basis…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRobert Kimball Insurance Company petitioned for a writ of certiorari to challenge the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction in a case against Sunz…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction Of Trial Court cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE
) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-390 ) SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed August 28, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge. Michael Krouse of Krouse Law Firm, Lakewood Ranch, for Petitioner. Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee; Jason L. Margolin of Akerman, LLP, Tampa; Jason S. Oletsky of Akerman, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We treat the petition for writ of certiorari challenging the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction as a petition for writ of prohibition, see Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 853 (Fla. 1992), and deny it accordingly. CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.