RONALD MCKEEHAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's denial of a Rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion is affirmed when the appellant has filed multiple repetitive motions on the same underlying conviction.
[1] Repetitive and abusive postconviction relief filings on the same underlying conviction may subject a pro se litigant to sanctions including a bar on pro se filing and ref…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRonald McKeehan, a pro se appellant, filed his sixth appeal challenging the trial court's denial of a Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Gain Time Forfeiture cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RONALD MCKEEHAN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-866
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed August 16, 2019
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Tom Young, Judge.
Ronald McKeehan, Chipley, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
SASSO, J.
For the sixth time, Appellant appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2001-CF-184-A-O. We affirm the trial court's order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions, such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
2
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.