MAURICE JAVON JACKSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appeal is dismissed as moot because a prior appellate decision resolved the underlying issue by requiring the trial court to impose Jackson's mandatory minimums concurrently rather than consecutively.
[1] An appeal is moot when a prior decision in the same case has already provided the relief sought and remanded the matter for implementation.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMaurice Javon Jackson appealed from a circuit court judgment imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Consecutive Mandatory Minimum Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
February 28, 2019 PER CURIAM. Based on this Court’s recent decision in Jackson v. State, 2019 WL 513654 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 11, 2019), quashing Jackson’s consecutive mandatory minimum sentences and remanding for the trial court “to enter an order imposing the mandatory minimums to run concurrently,” the current appeal is dismissed as moot. DISMISSED. ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________ Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Appellant; Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.