CLAYTON BIGGER
v.
WILLIAM J. CUM O/B/O W.C.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A domestic violence injunction must be corrected when it improperly extends protection to both the appellee and his child rather than limiting protection to the child alone.
[1] A domestic violence injunction must be limited in scope to protect only the designated beneficiary and must be corrected if it improperly extends protection to additional…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClayton Bigger sought to dissolve a domestic violence injunction issued in Broward County. The injunction as written protected both the appellee and h…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Non-Final Order Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
CLAYTON BIGGER, Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. CUM o/b/o W.C., JR., Appellee.
No. 4D19-1003
[September 18, 2019]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nickolaus Hunter Davis, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE 17-2438.
Sommer C. Horton of Horton Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.
Paulina Forrest of Law Office of Daniel E. Forrest, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Clayton Bigger appeals an order denying his motion to dissolve a domestic violence injunction. We reverse and remand in part, with instructions to correct the order to remove any mention of the injunction protecting both the appellee and his child instead of only the child. The appellee concedes error on this point. We otherwise affirm without comment.
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part with instructions.
GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *