ALONZO HEARD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner whose habeas corpus petition has been denied may be cautioned that further abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings will result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filings and referral for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant for filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous petitions by imposing a bar on future pro se filings and referring the matt…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAlonzo Heard, an inmate at Raiford, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court case numbers 2019-CA-7492 and…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ALONZO HEARD,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D19-2285
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed September 13, 2019
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Alonzo Heard, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance for Respondent.
EDWARDS, J.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case Numbers 2019-CA-7492 and 2012-CF-16067. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case numbers may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). COHEN and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.