LAMONT J. DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A dismissal without prejudice of a rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion is not a final, appealable order.
[1] A dismissal without prejudice of a rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion is not a final, appealable order because it permits the movant to refile a sufficient motion.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLamont Davis appealed an order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing without prejudice his rule 3.850 motion for postconvictio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appealability Of Non-Final Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
LAMONT J. DAVIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-1466
[ October 23, 2019 ]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CF000850A.
Lamont J. Davis, Bonifay, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Lamont Davis appeals an order both denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing without prejudice his rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus only. Because the dismissal of the rule 3.850 motion was without prejudice to refile a sufficient motion, it is not a final, appealable order. See Russell v. State, 46 So. 3d 151, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
Affirmed.
WARNER, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *