DAVID ALLEN EVERETT, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Although counsel has a duty to advise a defendant about jail credit as a direct consequence of a plea, a defendant fails to establish ineffective assistance of counsel when he does not allege that he would have rejected the plea absent the alleged misadvice.
[1] Jail credit is a direct consequence of a plea affecting the range of punishment and must be included in counsel's advice regarding the terms of a plea agreement.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Credit for time served, or jail credit, is a direct consequence of a plea because it affects the range of punishment—in this case, the length of [the defendant's] incarceration—in a definite manner, immediately and automatically upon imposition of a sentence.”
Court citing Reyna v. State to establish that jail credit is a direct consequence of a plea requiring counsel's advice
Everett entered a global plea in three criminal cases and later filed a Rule 3.850 motion claiming his counsel was ineffective for failing to fully ad…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Hill V. Lockhart Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DAVID ALLEN EVERETT, JR.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-1082
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 18, 2019
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
David Allen Everett, Jr., Live Oak, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the postconviction court’s summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We affirm. In his postconviction motion, Appellant argued that his counsel was ineffective for failing to fully advise him of the terms of his global plea; specifically, how much credit for time served he would receive in each of three criminal cases. The postconviction court
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, EDWARDS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1985)
- Reyna v. State, 18 So. 3d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)