STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
GEORGE E. MELENDEZ, III
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A downward departure sentence based on a victim's need for restitution must be supported by competent, substantial evidence, not merely by unsworn assertions from defense counsel.
[1] A downward departure sentence predicated on a victim's need for restitution requires competent, substantial evidence to support that need; unsworn assertions from defense…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A defense counsel's unsworn assertions cannot support a downward departure.”
Court explaining why the trial court's reliance on discussions with Melendez's counsel was insufficient to support the departure.
Melendez was charged with second-degree grand theft, defrauding a financial institution, and three counts of cashing or depositing a worthless item wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Second Degree Grand Theft cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1420
GEORGE E. MELENDEZ, III,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 25, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, John E. Jordan, Judge.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge.
The State appeals the downward departure sentence imposed on George E. Melendez, III. We reverse the sentence because the departure is not supported by competent, substantial evidence.
2 Melendez was charged with second-degree grand theft, defrauding a financial institution, and three counts of cashing or depositing a worthless item with intent to defraud. Melendez's victim was the CFE Federal Credit Union. His scoresheet provided that the lowest permissible sentence would be 27.45 months. The trial court, finding the victim's need for restitution outweighed the need for incarceration, made a downward departure and sentenced Melendez to time served and three years of probation. While a victim's need for restitution is a valid reason for a downward departure sentence, see § 921.0026(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2017), there must be competent, substantial evidence to support the victim's need. See State v. Wheeler, 180 So. 3d 1117, 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). Here, there was zero evidence that CFE Federal Credit Union needed the restitution. Instead, the trial court based its decision on discussions with Melendez's counsel. A defense counsel's unsworn assertions cannot support a downward departure. See State v. Montgomery, 155 So. 3d 1182, 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Accordingly, Melendez's sentence must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. On remand, Melendez must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea. See Wheeler, 180 So. 3d at 1120. If Melendez elects to be resentenced under the Criminal Punishment Code, the trial court is not precluded from imposing a new downward departure sentence based on a valid legal ground that is supported by substantial, competent evidence. See Jackson v. State, 64 So. 3d 90, 93 (Fla. 2011). REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jackson v. State, 64 So. 3d 90 (Fla. 2011)
- State v. Wheeler, 180 So. 3d 1117 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
- State v. Clay Montgomery, 155 So. 3d 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)