LAWRENCE F. CURTIN
v.
JANET CROOM
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in the domestic relations case was affirmed.
Lawrence F. Curtin appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County, in a domestic relations matter (c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Representation cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
LAWRENCE F. CURTIN, Appellant,
v.
JANET CROOM, Appellee.
No. 4D18-3643
[November 27, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County;
A.B.
Majeed, Senior Judge;
L.T.
Case No. 562018DR002895.
Lawrence F. Curtin, Fort Pierce, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
LEVINE, C.J., MAY, J., and PHILLIPS, CAROL-LISA, Associate Judge, concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.