ZIEDRA JENKINS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's revocation of probation and imposition of sentence is affirmed, though the revocation order must specify the particular conditions of probation that were violated.
[1] When a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, the court must render a written order specifying the particular conditions of probation that were violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If a trial court revokes a defendant's probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.”
Lambert, J., concurring specially, citing King v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
Jenkins entered an open plea admitting she violated the terms and conditions of her probation. The trial court accepted the plea, revoked probation, a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ZIEDRA JENKINS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3328
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed December 13, 2019
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Nancy Maloney, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Craig R. Atack, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, C.J., and EISNAUGLE, J., concur. LAMBERT, J., concurs specially with opinion.
2
LAMBERT, J., concurring specially.
5D18-3328
I concur with the majority’s summary affirmance of this appeal. Appellant tendered an open plea admitting that she violated the terms and conditions of her probation. The trial court accepted Appellant’s plea, revoked probation, and imposed a lawful prison sentence upon Appellant. However, the order revoking probation did not specify the condition or conditions of probation that Appellant violated. This was error. See King v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“If a trial court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.”) (additional citations omitted).
Neither party has raised this error in this non-Anders1 appeal. If, following the issuance of our mandate, this matter is properly raised by either party below, the trial court should thereafter enter a proper order of revocation.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Ira C. King, III v. State, 46 So. 3d 1171 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)