MARY E. NICKLES
v.
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION AND JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission's decision was affirmed.
Mary E. Nickles appealed a decision by the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission regarding her reemployment assistance claim against Jupiter Medi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unemployment Benefits Eligibility cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MARY E. NICKLES, Appellant,
v.
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, and JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER, Appellees.
No. 4D19-1346
[January 8, 2020]
Appeal from the State of Florida, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, L.T. Case No. R.A.A.C. Docket No. 19-00373.
Mary E. Nickles, Royal Palm Beach, pro se.
Katie E. Sabo, Tallahassee, for appellee Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Doss-Pouncey v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 16 So. 3d 252, 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (citing Rollins v. Bay HR, Inc., 968 So. 2d 697, 698–99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)).
TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.