JENNA CETTO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must specify which conditions of probation were violated in its order finding a probation violation.
[1] A trial court must specify which conditions of probation were violated in its order finding a probation violation.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJenna Cetto admitted to violating her probation, and the trial court imposed a judgment and sentence. However, the trial court's order did not specify…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JENNA CETTO,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-1956
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
/
Opinion filed January 24, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Thomas W. Turner, Senior Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ON CONCESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Jenna Cetto appeals the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after she admitted to violating her probation. We affirm the violation. However, as the State properly concedes, we are compelled to remand because the trial court failed to specify which conditions of probation Cetto violated. See Lowe v. State, 225 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); Manis v. State, 30 So. 3d 586, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).
2
Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand to the trial court for entry of a proper order specifying the conditions of probation Cetto violated.
VACATED and REMANDED.
EVANDER, C.J., COHEN and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Orion Hunter Manis v. State, 30 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
- Lowe v. State, 225 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)