STEPHEN HERNANDEZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA AND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner whose habeas corpus petition has been denied may be sanctioned for abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings by barring future pro se filings and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may warn a pro se litigant that continued filing of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous petitions may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filin…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceStephen Hernandez, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992-CF-1831-B. The cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
STEPHEN HERNANDEZ,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D19-3243
STATE OF FLORIDA AND
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondents.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 21, 2020
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Stephen Hernandez, Bushnell, Pro se.
No Appearance for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of Habeas Corpus stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992-CF-1831-B. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 1992-CF-1831-B may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which
2 may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
ORFINGER, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.