BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
v.
GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC, CARLOS MENDEZ, ROSA MENDEZ AND WYNDHAM LAKES ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A mortgagee in a foreclosure action is not required to prove that its mortgage is superior to the interest of a named defendant property owner; naming the party in the complaint provides constructive notice of the asserted superior interest.
[1] In a foreclosure action, naming a defendant in the complaint provides constructive notice that the plaintiff asserts a superior interest in the property, and the plaintif…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“By naming a party in the complaint, the plaintiff provides notice to the named parties that the plaintiff is asserting a superior interest.”
Court's explanation of why BOA was not required to prove superiority of its mortgage interest
Bank of America became the owner of a promissory note and mortgage executed by Carlos and Rosa Mendez. When the Mendezes defaulted, BOA filed a forecl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Involuntary Dismissal Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-801
GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC,
CARLOS MENDEZ, ROSA MENDEZ
AND WYNDHAM LAKES ESTATES
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Appellees.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 13, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Emerson R. Thompson, Jr., Senior Judge.
Mary J. Walter, of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for Appellant.
Angela Leiner, of The Law Office of Angela Leiner, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee, Green Emerald Homes, LLC. No Appearance for Other Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”), appeals the trial court’s involuntary dismissal of its action to foreclose a promissory note and mortgage at the close of its case in chief.
2 Because we conclude BOA was not required to prove that its mortgage was superior to the interest of the property owner, Green Emerald Homes, LLC, we reverse.
Following several assignments, BOA became the owner of a note and mortgage executed by Carlos and Rose Mendez. When the Mendezes defaulted on their obligations, BOA filed a foreclosure action, naming Green Emerald as a defendant because Green Emerald allegedly owned the property.1 Green Emerald moved to dismiss the complaint, alleging, among other things, that the complaint failed to plead that BOA’s interest was superior to Green Emerald’s interest. The trial court denied the motion.
At trial, BOA proved the mortgage agreement, a default, acceleration, and the amount due—all the necessary elements of a foreclosure action. See Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n (Fannie Mae), 220 So. 3d 566, 568 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). When BOA rested its case, Green Emerald moved for an involuntary dismissal, arguing that BOA had not proven that its interest in the property was superior to Green Emerald’s interest. The trial court granted Green Emerald’s motion and involuntarily dismissed the action. This was error.
“By naming a party in the complaint, the plaintiff provides notice to the named parties that the plaintiff is asserting a superior interest.” Id. The trial court errs when it dismisses an action for the failure of the plaintiff to allege or prove the superiority of its lien. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon for Bear Stearns Arm Tr., Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-7 v. Thompson, 230 So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
3
Accordingly, we reverse the order involuntarily dismissing the action and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Black Point Assets, Inc. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n ("Fannie MAE"), 220 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
- Bank OF NEW York Mellon v. Thompson, 230 So. 3d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)