JUSTIN CORDERO MILLAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A claim that a sentence was imposed vindictively is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
[1] A claim that a sentence was imposed vindictively is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJustin Cordero Millan appealed from the trial court's denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion in Orange County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vindictive Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JUSTIN CORDERO MILLAN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-13
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 13, 2020
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, John E. Jordan, Judge.
Justin C. Millan, Lowell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Bouno v. State, 900 So. 2d 672, 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (holding that the appellant’s claim that he was the victim of a vindictive sentence from the trial court was not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)).
LAMBERT, EDWARDS, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.