ROBERTO COLON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner whose habeas corpus petition has been denied may be cautioned that further similarly inappropriate pro se filings asserting claims from the same cases may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filing and referral for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may warn a pro se litigant that further abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filing and referral…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRoberto Colon, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Osceola County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2011-CF-1757 and 201…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
ROBERTO COLON,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D20-341
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 20, 2020
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Roberto Colon, South Bay, pro se.
No appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Osceola County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2011-CF-1757 and 2012-CA-3269-OC. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further similarly inappropriate pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Osceola County Circuit Court Case Nos. 2011-CF-1757 and 2012-CA-3269-OC may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
EVANDER, C.J., EDWARDS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.