R.V., MOTHER OF E.V., A CHILD
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a trial court terminates parental rights on multiple statutory grounds, reversal of one ground does not require reversal of the entire termination judgment if at least one other ground is supported by sufficient evidence.
[1] When parental rights are terminated on multiple statutory grounds, the reversal of one ground does not require reversal of the termination judgment if at least one other…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because [the Department of Children and Families] was required to prove only one statutory ground for termination, we do not need to address whether the trial court correctly relied on other grounds for termination.”
Court's explanation for why reversal of the abandonment finding does not require reversal of the entire termination judgment
R.V. appealed a final judgment terminating her parental rights to E.V. The trial court found five statutory grounds for termination, including abandon…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standard Of Review For Sufficiency Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
R.V., MOTHER OF E.V., A CHILD,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-162
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed March 31, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Jennifer Taylor, Judge.
Valarie Linnen, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Kelley Schaeffer, Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.
Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Joanna Summers Brunell, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem Program.
PER CURIAM.
R.V. (“Mother”) appeals the final judgment terminating her parental rights to E.V. Mother’s sole argument on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to establish abandonment pursuant to section 39.806(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2019). While we agree
2
with Mother on that point, abandonment was just one of the five statutory grounds underlying the trial court’s termination of Mother’s parental rights. Mother admits that the remaining four statutory grounds for termination, as well as the trial court’s findings related to the least restrictive means and manifest best interests, are supported by the evidence. “Because [the Department of Children and Families] was required to prove only one statutory ground for termination, we do not need to address whether the trial court correctly relied on other grounds for termination.” D.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 250 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment terminating Mother’s parental rights to E.V. but reverse as to the finding of abandonment and remand for entry of an amended final judgment. See D.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 211 So. 3d 351, 352 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); J.L. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 143 So. 3d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with instructions.
COHEN, LAMBERT and WALLIS, JJ., concur.