CHARLES FAUSTIN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2020-04-15
No. 19-3005
Marx, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The trial court properly denied the defendant's Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

Facts & Procedural History

Charles Faustin appealed an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion filed in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Rule 3.850 Motion For Post-Conviction Relief Rule 3.850 Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 Motion For Postconviction Relief

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.850 Motion For Post-Conviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHARLES FAUSTIN, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D19-3005

[April 15, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Joseph Marx, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CF017526CXX.

Charles Faustin, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 276 So 3d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

* * *

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw