SHAWN SILSBY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-04-09
No. 19-2091
Craig, J., Lambert, J., Eisnaugle, J., Sasso, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is remanded for entry of a corrected order specifying which conditions of probation were violated.

Headnotes

[1] An order revoking probation or imposing probation conditions must specifically identify which conditions of probation were violated.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Facts & Procedural History

Shawn Silsby appealed his conviction and sentence in a case arising from Volusia County Circuit Court. The appeal was handled as an Anders case, in wh…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Sentencing Review Anders Brief Procedure Anders Brief Procedure

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Review cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
Sasso

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SHAWN SILSBY,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-2091

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed April 9, 2020

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Dennis Craig, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 case, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for a corrected order identifying the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. See Hollis v. State, 277 So. 3d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

2

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw