SHAWN SILSBY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must strike an award of investigative costs that was not requested and is not supported by competent substantial evidence.
[1] An award of investigative costs must be supported by competent substantial evidence and cannot be imposed without such evidentiary support.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“An award of investigative costs must be supported by competent substantial evidence.”
Court citing Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
Shawn Silsby was convicted and sentenced in Volusia County Circuit Court. The trial court imposed costs including a $100 cost of investigation for the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Brief Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
SHAWN SILSBY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2088
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 17, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Dennis Craig, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon George Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 case, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for a corrected costs judgment striking the $100 cost of investigation for the