ALFREDO DAVID CHAMOL-MERINO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-04-21
No. 19-1924
Chase, J., Evander, C.J., Orfinger, J., Eisnaugle, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court properly denied the appellant's Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.


Facts & Procedural History

Alfredo David Chamol-Merino filed a Rule 3.850 motion in the Circuit Court for Seminole County seeking post-conviction relief.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Evander

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ALFREDO DAVID CHAMOL-MERINO, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D19-1924 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 21, 2020 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Melanie Chase, Judge. Brandon F. Dark, of Law Office of Brandon

F. Dark, PA, Orlando, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Yanez v. State, 170 So. 3d 9, 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Rosario v. State, 165 So. 3d 672, 672–73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). EVANDER, C.J., ORFINGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw