ALEX MICHAEL PALOMINO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The conviction is affirmed, but the case is remanded to correct a scrivener's error in the sentencing order that overstated costs by $350.
[1] A scrivener's error in a sentencing order reflecting an incorrect total of fines and costs may be corrected on remand to the trial court.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“erroneously reflecting a total of $2,141.50 in costs when the correct figure is actually $1,791.50”
The court identified the specific scrivener's error requiring correction
Alex Michael Palomino was convicted in Lake County Circuit Court. The sentencing order contained an arithmetic error in calculating fines and costs.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ALEX MICHAEL PALOMINO,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2463
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 1, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, James R. Baxley , Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). However, we remand to allow the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the order on fines and costs, erroneously reflecting a total of $2,141.50 in costs when the correct figure is actually $1,791.50. See Skinner v. State, 155 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. ORFINGER, WALLIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Alyssia Skinner v. State, 155 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)