MISTY CARLSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF K.H., A CHILD
v.
VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOLS AND CITY OF DELAND

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-05-15
No. 19-0091
Wallis, J., Eisnaugle, J., Traver, J., Rowe, III, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Summary judgment is improper when video evidence and interrogatory answers do not conclusively resolve material facts in dispute.


Headnotes

[1] Summary judgment is improper when video evidence, though probative, does not conclusively resolve material factual disputes and the slightest doubt remains as to the fact…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“If the 'slightest doubt' exists, then summary judgment must be reversed.”

Court's standard for evaluating summary judgment motions, citing Skelton v. Real Estate Sols. Home Sellers, LLC

Facts & Procedural History

Misty Carlson, individually and as parent of K.H., sued the City of Deland and Volusia County Schools arising from an accident. The trial court grante…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Wallis

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MISTY CARLSON, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL

GUARDIAN OF K.H., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-91

Corrected

VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOLS

AND THE CITY OF DELAND,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 15, 2020

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Randell H. Rowe, III, Judge.

Craig R. Lynd and Christopher H. Hunt, of Kaufman & Lynd, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant.

Michael J. Roper, Cindy A. Townsend and Nicholas J. Mari, of Bell & Roper, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, City of Deland. No Appearance for Appellee, Volusia County Schools

2

WALLIS, J.

Misty Carlson, individually and as parent and natural guardian of K.H., appeals the final summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Deland, arguing the lower court erred because there were unresolved issues of fact. We agree. In granting summary judgment, the trial court relied on Carlson's interrogatory answers and a video that captured the accident. After reviewing the video and interrogatory answers, we conclude that genuine issues of material fact remain as to the accident. See Skelton v. Real Estate Sols. Home Sellers, LLC, 202 So. 3d 960, 961 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) ("If the 'slightest doubt' exists, then summary judgment must be reversed." (quoting Sierra v. Shevin, 767 So. 2d 524, 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000))). In particular, we note that the video does not conclusively refute Carlson's allegations and, even if it did, summary judgment would still likely be improper at this point. See Lopez v. Wilsonart, LLC, 275 So. 3d 831, 834 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (holding summary judgment improper even though video evidence strongly refuted other evidence), review granted, SC19-1336, 2019 WL 5188546 (Fla. Oct. 15, 2019). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. REVERSED and REMANDED.

EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw