DERRICK WEBSTER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MERRITA WEBSTER VS SHELLEY C. GLOVER, M.D., SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., INDEPENDENT CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. D/B/A TAMPA PATHOLOGY LABORATORY AND JOSE
v.
SUAREZ-HOYOS, M.D.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in refusing to order a new trial based on closing argument tactics unless those arguments so damaged the fairness of the trial as to require a new trial.
[1] A trial court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial based on closing argument tactics unless those arguments so damaged the fairness of the tria…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We strongly disapprove of the tactics used during [Appellee's] closing argument. We find, however, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to order a new trial.”
Court's analysis of whether improper closing arguments warranted a new trial
Merrita Webster died, and her personal representative brought a medical malpractice action against multiple defendants including Dr. Shelley C. Glover…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse New Trial Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DERRICK WEBSTER, AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE
OF MERRITA WEBSTER,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-730
SHELLEY C. GLOVER, M.D., SOUTH LAKE
HOSPITAL, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
INDEPENDENT CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
D/B/A TAMPA PATHOLOGY LABORATORY AND
JOSE V. SUAREZ-HOYOS, M.D.,
Appellees.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 15, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County,
G. Richard Singeltary, Judge.
Christopher V. Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Appellant.
Jason M. Azzarone, Louis J. La Cava, and James D. Wetzel, of La Cava & Jacobson, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Shelley C. Glover, M.D. No Appearance for other Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
HARRIS, GROSSHANS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Murphy v. Int'l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2000)
- Oreste Dorrielan v. State, 92 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)