NATHAN A. ST. OURS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-05-15
No. 19-2904
Clayton, J., Cohen, J., Wallis, J., Grosshans, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court may not impose a cost of investigation assessment under Florida Statute § 938.27(1) when the State has not requested it and the amount is arbitrary.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court may not impose a cost of investigation assessment under Florida Statute § 938.27(1) when the State has not requested such costs before judgment is entered,…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The State did not request the $100 assessment, and the Legislature did not intend for the imposition of an arbitrary amount of costs.”

Court's explanation for why the cost of investigation assessment must be struck

Facts & Procedural History

Nathan St. Ours pleaded no contest to robbery and resisting an officer without violence. The trial court imposed a sentence conforming to the negotiat…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Grosshans

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

NATHAN A. ST. OURS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-2904

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 15, 2020

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, James R. Clayton, Judge.

David Maldonado, of The Maldonado Law Firm, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellant. Nathan A. St. Ours, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela

J.

Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Nathan St. Ours pleaded no contest to robbery and resisting an officer without violence. His sentence conformed to the negotiated plea agreement and is lawful except for the assessment of a $100 cost of investigation. The State did not request the $100 assessment, and the Legislature did not intend for the imposition of an arbitrary amount of costs. § 938.27(1), Fla. Stat. (2019).

2 We remand with directions that the trial court enter an amended costs judgment that does not include the $100 cost of investigation assessment.1 See Chambers v. State, 217 So. 3d 210, 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

COHEN, WALLIS and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 The Florida Supreme Court has made it clear that when the State fails to request investigation costs before the trial court enters its judgment, the State’s opportunity to request such costs has passed, and the trial court may not impose that assessment on remand. Richards v. State, 288 So. 3d 574, 577 (Fla. 2020).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw