RENEE T. ROUNDTREE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-06-05
No. 19-1235
Davis, J., Eisnaugle, J., Harris, J., Sasso, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the order of revocation must be corrected to identify the proper condition violated.

Headnotes

[1] An order of probation revocation must correctly identify which specific condition of probation was violated, and remand is required when the written order misidentifies t…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Facts & Procedural History

Renee T. Roundtree appealed her judgment and sentence following a probation revocation proceeding in Lake County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Anders Appeal Probation Revocation

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
Sasso

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RENEE T. ROUNDTREE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-1235

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2020

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Heidi Davis, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn R. Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for a corrected order of revocation because the written order incorrectly finds

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions. EISNAUGLE, HARRIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2 that Appellant violated Standard Condition 1 instead of Special Condition 1. See Daniels v. State, 200 So. 3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw