MANUEL GORDON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-06-05
No. 19-3086
Alva, M.M., Wallis, J., Lambert, J., Edwards, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is remanded for the trial court to correct a mathematical error in calculating costs.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court's mathematical error in calculating court costs may be corrected on remand even when the judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed on appeal.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Manuel Gordon appealed his conviction and sentence in a criminal case from Seminole County Circuit Court. The trial court made a mathematical error in…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Edwards

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MANUEL GORDON,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-3086

STATE OF FLORIDA,,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2020 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Glendon G. Gordon, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm, without further discussion, the judgment and sentence imposed upon Appellant in this Anders1 appeal. We note that the trial court made a mathematical error

Footnotes
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2 in totaling the cost due. We remand for the trial court to enter the correct cost in the amount of $466. See Skinner v. State, 155 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). AFFIRMED. REMANDED with Instructions. WALLIS, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw