TAWNYAMAE CRICHTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must enter a formal order of violation that specifically lists the conditions of community control found to have been violated, rather than leaving the violation unspecified.
[1] A trial court must enter a formal written order of violation that specifically identifies the conditions of community control found to have been violated; merely attachin…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“merely attaching an affidavit of violation of probation and community control to the final judgment is insufficient”
Court citing Cato v. State for the proposition that a formal order of violation must be entered
Appellant Crichton admitted orally and in writing to violating her community control at her revocation hearing. However, the trial court's order of vi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Community Control cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
TAWNYAMAE CRICHTON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-3608
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 10, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Sandra C. Upchurch, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
WALLIS, J.
In this Anders1 appeal, Appellant challenges the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following the revocation of her community control. We affirm without further discussion, with one exception.
2
Appellant provided an oral and written admission to violating her community control at the time of her hearing. However, the order of violation does not specify which condition of community control Appellant violated. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to enter a formal order of violation that lists the specific conditions the court determined Appellant violated. See Robinson v. State, 138 So. 3d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (remanding to the trial court for entry of a written order specifying the conditions of community control the trial court found defendant to have violated); Cato v. State, 845 So. 2d 250, 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (remanding for entry of a formal order of violation and explaining that merely attaching an affidavit of violation of probation and community control to the final judgment is insufficient). AFFIRMED; REMANDED with Instructions.
ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Kosha Robinson v. State, 138 So. 3d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)