LARRY CINCO AND PAUL FLAIG
v.
COQUINA PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Special damages under the wrongful act doctrine must be specifically pleaded and cannot be awarded when not alleged in the complaint.
[1] The wrongful act doctrine, which permits recovery of attorney's fees as special damages when a defendant's wrongful act causes a plaintiff to litigate with a third party,…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Special damages 'do not follow by implication of law merely upon proof of the breach.'”
Court explaining the requirement that special damages must be specifically pleaded
Flaig, an HOA board member, conspired with Cinco to defraud the HOA, including facilitating Cinco's unsuccessful lawsuit against the HOA that caused t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Wrongful Act Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
LARRY CINCO AND PAUL FLAIG,
Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v. Case No. 5D18-2897
COQUINA PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., INC.,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 21, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Tonya B. Rainwater, Judge.
Adam M. Bird, of WhiteBird, PLLC, Melbourne, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Paul Flaig. Charles A. Schillinger, of Schillinger & Coleman, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Larry Cinco.
Charles C. Powers, of The Powers Law Firm, Indian Harbour Beach, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Larry Cinco (“Cinco”) and Paul Flaig (“Flaig”) appeal a final judgment in favor of Coquina Palms Homeowners Association, Inc. (the “HOA”). Of the thirteen issues raised on appeal, one merits discussion. We agree with Flaig that the trial court erred in
2 awarding the HOA relief under the wrongful act doctrine when the HOA did not plead this special damage. Following a bifurcated bench trial, the HOA prevailed on its breach of fiduciary duty claim against Flaig and its conspiracy to commit fraud claim against Cinco. Flaig, an HOA board member, had conspired with Cinco, his long-time friend, to defraud the HOA. This conspiracy included Flaig’s efforts to facilitate Cinco’s unsuccessful lawsuit against the HOA, which caused the HOA to incur attorney’s fees. The trial court awarded the HOA its attorney’s fees as damages for Flaig’s breach of fiduciary duty under the wrongful act doctrine. The wrongful act doctrine is an exception to the general rule that attorney’s fees are recoverable only when a contract or statute authorizes recovery. Bidon v. Dep’t of Prof’l Reg., 596 So. 2d 450, 452 n.3 (Fla. 1992). The doctrine allows a plaintiff to recover its attorney’s fees as a special damage when a defendant’s wrongful act caused the plaintiff to litigate with a third party. Rayburn v. Bright, 163 So. 3d 735, 736–37 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). Special damages “do not follow by implication of law merely upon proof of the breach.” Land Title of Cent. Fla., LLC v. Jimenez, 946 So. 2d 90, 93 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). As with all special damages, the HOA had to specifically plead the wrongful act doctrine. See id.; See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.120(g). In its second amended third-party complaint, the HOA merely alleged that it had suffered damages, including attorney’s fees, “as a direct and proximate cause of [Flaig’s] material and substantial breach of fiduciary duty.” The HOA did not specifically plead the wrongful act doctrine, and accordingly, it cannot recover its fees on this basis. On remand, the trial court should vacate that portion of the final judgment awarding the HOA
EVANDER, C.J., SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Muroff v. Dill, 386 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- Stevens v. Cricket Club Condo., Inc., 784 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Bidon v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 596 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1992)
- Scott v. McDONOUGH, 946 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Rayburn v. Bright, 163 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)