JEFF ROBERT SHIDLOFSKY
v.
AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP.

Fla. 4th DCA | 2020-11-25
No. 20-0441
Frink, J., Levine, C.J., Warner, J., Artau, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Notice is a statutorily valid precondition required under the applicable uniform commercial code provision.


Headnotes

[1] A provision of the uniform commercial code codified in Florida requires notice as a statutorily valid precondition to the exercise of rights thereunder.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Shidlofsky appealed a circuit court decision in a case against American Honda Finance Corporation. The case involved interpretation of a uniform comme…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Levine

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEFF ROBERT SHIDLOFSKY, Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 4D20-441

[November 25, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-20541 (12).

Lawrence R. Metsch of Metschlaw, P.A., Aventura, for appellant.

Danielle N. Robinson of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Gen. Matters, Inc. v. Paramount Canning Co., 382 So. 2d 1262, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (interpreting similar provision of the uniform commercial code codified in Florida to require notice as a statutorily valid precondition).

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw