BERLIN ERIC STOUTE, III
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-11-13
No. 19-2935
Harris, J., Cohen, J., Edwards, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The sentencing scoresheet must be corrected by removing 4.2 points in accordance with the trial court's ruling on appellant's motion to correct sentencing error.


Headnotes

[1] When the State concedes error in the calculation of a sentencing scoresheet, the appellate court may remand for correction of the scoresheet without further proceedings.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Berlin Eric Stoute, III appealed his sentence from Orange County Circuit Court. The State conceded error regarding the calculation of Stoute's sentenc…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Harris

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

BERLIN ERIC STOUTE, III,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D19-2935

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2020

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jenifer M. Harris, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We accept the State’s concession of error in this case and remand solely for correction of Appellant’s scoresheet. On remand, in accordance with the court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to correct sentencing error, 4.2 points shall be removed from the scoresheet. See Perez v. State, 840 So. 2d 1179, 1180 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

COHEN, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes
2 AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Correction of Scoresheet.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw