SANTIAGO TORRES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2020-11-17
No. 20-1273
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2020)

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SANTIAGO TORRES,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D20-1273

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed November 17, 2020

3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Jenifer M. Harris, Judge.

Santiago Torres, Lake City, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hogan v. State, 894 So. 2d 1070, 1071 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“By packaging the same legal issue in a different form or format, a party or defendant cannot avoid the impact of the law of the case doctrine: the finality of legal issues once pursued on the merits, to their ultimate conclusion.” (citing State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 2003); Knox v. State, 873 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dism., 884 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 2004))). EVANDER, C.J., LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw