JACK STONE,
v.
PETER EDWARD GERMANN,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order was affirmed because the appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.
Jack Stone appealed from an order of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The specific underlying dispute is not detailed in this summary affirman…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D20-1235 & 3D20-1236 Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-23904 & 18-23897 ________________
Jack Stone, Appellant,
vs.
Elizabeth Helen Germann and Peter Edward Germann, Appellees.
Appeals under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michaelle Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.
Jack Stone, in proper person.
Elizabeth Helen Germann and Peter Edward Germann, in proper persons.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).
Affirmed.