JEAN DESROSES,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1763 Lower Tribunal No. 94-20024A ________________ Jean Desroses, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes Simon, Judge. Jean Desroses, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2 Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (holding that the “could have been imposed” test is the proper one to apply to a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence resulting from a scoresheet error, and that “if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a corrected scoresheet, any error was harmless”); Masis v. State, 245 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007)
- Masis v. State, 245 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)