EARNEST L. MILLS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied appellant's rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence.
[1] A trial court's denial of a rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence may be affirmed, and a court may impose sanctions including a bar on pro se filings and refer…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEarnest L. Mills, proceeding pro se, appealed the denial of his rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence in an underlying criminal case from 2…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
EARNEST L. MILLS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-1985
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 12, 2021
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Luis Fernando Calderon , Judge.
Earnest L. Mills, Madison, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence in Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2007-CF-013401-A-O. We affirm the trial court’s order and caution Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to the identified lower court case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2018); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999).
AFFIRMED.
HARRIS, SASSO, and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
2