EDWARD HAUBER
v.
CYNTHIA HAUBER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's nonfinal order was affirmed.
This is a family law case involving Edward Hauber and Cynthia Hauber. The trial court issued a nonfinal order in the domestic relations case.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Non-Final Order Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
EDWARD HAUBER, Appellant,
v.
CYNTHIA HAUBER, Appellee.
No. 4D20-1655
[March 24, 2021]
Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jessica Ticktin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-DR-000295-XXXX-SB.
Alan Jay Braverman and Marko Ilich of Stok Kon + Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
M. Shannon McLin and Melissa Alagna of Florida Appeals, Orlando, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Casto v. Casto, 508 So. 2d 330, 334 (Fla. 1987).
WARNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *